MÁS ALLÁ DE LOS NÚMEROS: LA INFLUENCIA DE LA PERSUASIÓN EN LAS DECISIONES DE INVERSIÓN DE LOS ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2023111

Palabras clave:

Finanzas Conductuales, Toma de Decisiones, Inversores no Profesionales, Persuasión

Resumen

Esta investigación tiene como objetivo verificar la influencia de los argumentos persuasivos en las decisiones de inversión de estudiantes universitarios. La investigación utilizó como teoría base la Teoría de la Persuasión, centrándose en el elemento de autoridad. Metodológicamente, el estudio se clasifica como correlacional y utilizó el método experimental, que involucró la participación de 576 estudiantes en el rol de inversionistas no profesionales. Se manipuló las variables argumento persuasivo y desempeño de la empresa distribuidas en seis escenarios diferentes, por lo que se utilizó un factorial 2x2, la técnica para el análisis de los datos para las hipótesis fue la Prueba Binomial y como análisis complementario de las características demográficas se utilizó el Regresión logística. Los resultados encontrados fueron: (i) las elecciones de los participantes fueron mayores para las empresas que presentan argumentos persuasivos de autoridad en los informes de los analistas financieros; (ii) los inversores prefieren empresas con mejor desempeño que empresas con peor desempeño; (iii) las opciones de los inversionistas fueron mayores para las empresas con peor desempeño pero que presentaban argumentos persuasivos en sus informes, en comparación con las empresas con mejor desempeño, pero sin la presencia de argumentos persuasivos. En conclusión, se notó que el argumento persuasivo influyó en la decisión de inversión, se encontró que las personas con menores ingresos están más influenciadas por el argumento persuasivo que aquellas con mayores ingresos. La investigación contribuye a la literatura sobre finanzas conductuales al identificar que el elemento persuasivo de la autoridad crea un atajo en la decisión del inversionista. Se sugiere que los inversores busquen mejorar el pensamiento crítico con respecto a las narrativas disponibles.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-Reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515. http://www.jstor.org/stable/255740.

Agliardi, E., Agliardi, R., & Spanjers, W. (2016). Corporate financing decisions under ambiguity: Pecking order and liquidity policy implications. Journal of Business Research, 69, 6012–6020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.016

Aguiar, A. B. (2017). Pesquisa experimental em contabilidade: Propósito, desenho e execução. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 10(2), 224-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2017100206

Alam, N., & So, J. (2020). Contributions of emotional flow in narrative persuasion: An empirical test of the emotional flow framework. Communication Quarterly, 68(2),161-182. http://doi/10.1080/01463373.2020.1725079.

Azmat, S., Ali, H., Brown, K., & Skully, M. (2021). Persuasion in Islamic finance. Australian Journal of Management, 46(2), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220926556.

Augustin, P., & Izhakian, Y. (2017). Ambiguity, volatility, and credit risk. SSRN- Eletronic Journal, 15, 1-58.

B3. (2021). Históricos pessoas físicas. São Paulo. http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/servicos-de-dados/market-data/consultas/mercado-a-vista/historico-pessoas-fisicas/.

Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2005). A survey of behavioral finance. In: G. Constantinides, M. Harris & R. Stulz. (Ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Finance, (1.vol., pp. 1053-1128). Amesterdã: Elsevier.

Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805-825.

Bi, S., Liu, Z., & Usman, K. (2017). The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 71, 10-18.

Bickart, B., Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2015). Does it pay to beat around the bush? The case of the obfuscating salesperson. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 596–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.010

Brauer, M., & Wiersema, M. (2018). Analyzing analyst research: A review of past coverage and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 218-248.

Camargo, R. D. C. C. P., & Alberton, L. (2023). A relevância da divulgação dos critérios de materialidade nas decisões de investidores. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 42(3), 52-68.

Cambra, U. C., & Herrero, S. G. (2013). La I Guerra Mundial y los orígenes de la Teoria de los Efectos. El caso de aliadófilos y germanófilos. História y Comunicatión Social, 18, 125-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.43418

Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., Osma, B. G., Gassen, J., Isman, S., & Jeanjean, T. (2014). Who uses financial reports and for what purpose? Evidence from capital providers. Accounting Europe, 11(2), 1-25.

Castro Jr, F. H. F., & Famá, R. (2002). As novas finanças e a teoria comportamental no contexto da tomada de decisão sobre investimentos. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração, 9(2), 26-35.

Chaicken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.

Chaicken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects os source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460-473.

Chia, R. C. J., Lim, S. Y., Ong, P. K., & Teh, S. F. (2015). Pre and post Chinese new year holiday effects: evidence from Hong Kong stock market. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(4), 1-14. http://doi:/10.1142/S021759081550023X

Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Haper Collins.

Coutinho, C. P. (2011). Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas: Teoria e prática. (2ªed.). Coimbra: Almedina.

Damasceno, R., & Iglesias, F. (2014). Táticas de persuasão de vendedores de shopping-centers: Um estudo de campo. Psicologia Argumento, 32(79), 187-195. http://doi:/10.7213/psicol..argum.32.s02.AO17

Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyan, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53, 1839-1885. http://www.jstor.org/stable/117455

Defleur, M. L., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1982). Theories of mass communication. (4 ed.). New York: Longman.

DellaVigna, S. & Gentzkow, M. (2010). Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, 2(1), 643-669.

Dorow, A., Macedo Jr., J. S., Nunes, P., Reina, D., & Maximiniano, D. R. (2010). A heurística da ancoragem e a tomada de decisão sob risco em investimento imobiliário. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 13(3), 86-101.

Du, N. (2009). Do investors react differently to range and point management earnings forecasts? The Journal of Behavioral Financial, 10, 195-203. http://doi:/10.1080/15427560903369276

Du, N., Stevens, K., & McEnroe, J. (2015). The effects of comprehensive income on investors’ judgments: An investigation of one-statement vs. two-statement presentation formats. Accounting Research Journal, 28(3), 284-299. http://doi/10.1108/ARJ-11-2013-0083

Duclos, R. (2015). The psychology of investment behavior: (De) biasing financial decision-making one graph at a time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 317-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.005

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical works. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Fávero L. P., & Belfiore P. (2017). Análise de dados: Técnicas multivariadas exploratórias com SPSS® e Stata®. Rio de Janeiro: Campus Elsevier.

Figueiredo, M. F. (2015). A intertextualidade como argumento da autoridade: O caso da carta-testemunho de Getúlio Vargas. Estudos Linguísticos, 44(3), 1386-1394.

Fotheringham, W. C. (1966). Perspective on persuasion. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Gomez-Carrasco, P., & Michelon, G. (2018). The power of stakeholders' voice: The effects of social media activism on stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 855-872. http://doi:10.1002/bse.1973

Han, J. T., Chen, Q., Liu, J. G., Luo, X. L., & Fan, W. (2017). The persuasion of borrowers’ voluntary information in peer to peer lending: An empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.004

Henry, E., & Peytcheva, M. (2018). Earnings-announcement narrative and investor judgment. The Accounting Review, 32(3), 1-44.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Rápido e devagar: Duas formas de pensar. Tradução: Cássio de Arantes Leite. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%28197903%2947%3A2%3C263%3APTAAOD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3

Kartasova, J., Gaspareniene, L., & Remeikiene, R. (2014). Influence of snake bite effect on investment return rate: Lithuanian example. Mykolas Romeris University, 5(27), 1769-1773.

Khan, M. T. I., Tan, S. H., & Chong, L. L. (2016). Perception of past portfolio returns, optimism and financial decisions. Review of Behavioral Finance, 9(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-02-2016-0005

Kimura, H., (2003). Aspectos comportamentais associados às reações do mercado de capitais. Revista de Administração Eletrônica, 2(1), 1-14.

Lee, H., Tsohou, A., & Choi, Y. (2017). Embedding persuasive features into policy issues: Implications to designing public participation processes. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.006

Lima, D. H. S., Rodrigues, J. M., Silva, C. A. T. & Silva, J. D. G. (2012). Impacto do nível de evidenciação de informações contábeis sobre a precificação de ações no contexto de seleção adversa: Uma pesquisa experimental. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Negócios, 14(43), 159-175.

Lima, M. V. (2003). Um estudo sobre finanças comportamentais. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresa Eletrônica, 2(1), 1-19.

Nwagbara, U., & Belal, A. (2019). Persuasive language of responsible organization? A critical discourse analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of Nigerian oil companies. Accounting, Audinting & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2395-2420. http://doi/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2485

Radoc, B. (2018). Case-Based investing: Stock selection under uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.007

Ramos, S. T. C., & Naranjo, E. S. (2014). Metodologia da investigação científica. Luanda: Escolar.

Rasheed, M. H., Rafique, A., Zahid, T. & Akhtar, M. W. (2018). Factors influencing investor’s decision making in Pakistan: Moderating the role of locus of control. Review of Behavioral Finance, 10(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-05-2016-0028

Riaz, L., & Hunjra, A. I. (2015). Relationship between psychological factors and investment decision making: The mediating role of risk perception. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9, 968–981.

Riley, T. J., Semin, G. R., & Yen, A. C. (2014). Patterns of language use in accounting narratives and their Impact on investment-related judgments and decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 59-84.

Ruiz, P. S., Wood, M. S., & Ruboyianes, A. L. (2021). Persuasive or polarizing? The influence of entrepreneurs’ use of ingratiation rhetoric on investor funding decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, 1-26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106120.

Sagarin, B. J., Cialdini, R. B., Rice, W. E., & Serna, S. B. (2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 526–541. http://doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.526

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. D. P. B. (2013). Metodologia de pesquisa. (5. ed.). Porto Alegre: Penso.

Santos, J. O., & Barros, C. A. S. (2011). O que determina a tomada de decisão financeira: Razão ou emoção? Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 13(38), 7-20.

Sarwar A., & Afaf, G. (2016). A comparison between psychological and economic factors affeting individual investor's decision-making behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 3, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1232907

Schwartzstein, J., & Sunderam, A. (2021). Using models to persuade. American Economic Review, 111(1), 276-323. https://doi:10.1257/aer.20191074.

Sharma, A. & Kumar, A. (2020). A review paper on behavioral finance: Study of emerging trends. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(2), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-06-2017-0050

Shen, L. (2013). Communication as persuasion. In P.Cobley & P. J. Schulz. (Ed.). Theories and models of communication (pp. 257-272). Berlim: De Guyter Mouton.

Shu, W., & Cheng, C. Y. (2012). How to improve consumer attitudes toward using credit cards online: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 335–345. https://doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2012.01.003

Smith, M. (2003). Research methods in accounting. London: Sage.

Souza, A. (2002). A persuasão: Estratégias da comunicação influente. Rio de Janeiro: Nordica.

Tauni, M. Z., Rao, Z. R., Fang, H., Mirza, S. S., Memon, Z. L., & Jebran, K. (2017). Do investor’s big five personality traits influence the association between information acquisition and stock trading behavior? China Finance Review International, 7(4), 450-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-06-2016-0059

Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2008). The pacification of institutional investors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 29-72.

Winchel, J. (2015). Investor reaction to the ambiguity and mix of positive and negative argumentation in favorable analyst reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 973–999. http://doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12108

Yang, W., & Ju, X. (2012). The research of investment decision-making behavior model under imperfect rationality. J. Convergence Information Technology, 7(14), 521–527.

Zhang, K. Z. K., Barnes, S. J., Zhao, S. J., & Zhang, H. (2018). Can consumers be persuaded on brand microblogs? An empirical study. Information & Management, 55, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.03.005

Publicado

2024-04-16

Cómo citar

Broietti, C., & Rover, S. (2024). MÁS ALLÁ DE LOS NÚMEROS: LA INFLUENCIA DE LA PERSUASIÓN EN LAS DECISIONES DE INVERSIÓN DE LOS ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS. Revista Universo Contábil, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2023111

Número

Sección

Sección Nacional