EVALUATION OF BUDGET INSTITUTIONALIZATION IN A RELIGIOUS CONFESSIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION
Keywords:
Institutional Theory, Budget, Institutional ContradictionsAbstract
The main objective of this research is to evaluate budget institutionalization in a confessional institution with religious influence. To this end, in the light of the Institutional Theory, specifically its New Institutional Sociology (NIS) current, which addresses institutionalization processes and institutional logic, we carried out qualitative research through a single case study in a religious Higher Education Institution (HEI) of the third sector. We collected data from managerial documents provided by the institution, interviews with the managers responsible for all stages regarding the budget, and a questionnaire for department managers. The analyses mainly showed ceremonial aspects, but also evidence of instrumentality in the budget use, its low diffusion, and the existence of strong normative isomorphism because the parent institution determines the use of the budget by all controlled units through the Ecclesiastical Administrative Regulation (EAR). Since we noticed a low level of institutional contradictions, we considered that the institutionalization of the budget use was due to legitimacy; if analyzed according to the Regulatory and Normative pillars, it shows the institutionalization of the artifact, which indicates that budget institutionalization was partially successful. To the academy, this study contributes with a theoretical model that enables assessing stages of institutionalization in religious organizations; for such organizations, these findings reveal that compliance with dogmatic norms leads to the reproduction of artifacts of predominantly ceremonial use.
Downloads
References
ANTHONY, R. N.; YOUNG, D. W. Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. 6th ed. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill, 1999.
ARNOLD, M. C.; GILLENKIRCH, R. M. Using negotiated budgets for planning and performance evaluation: An experimental study. Accounting, Organizations and Society; 43, 1-16, may, 2015.
BEUREN, I. M.; BECK, F.; POPIK, F. Interesses compartilhados afetam a veracidade do orçamento?. Revista Contabilidade e Finanças; 26(67), 11-26, 2015.
BOOTH, P. Accounting in Churches: A Research Framework and Agenda. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability; 6(4), 37-67, 1993.
COSTA, F.; GASSNER, F. P.; ESPEJO, M. M. D. S. B.; PACHECO, V. A compreensão das práticas de contabilidade gerencial à luz do paradigma espiritual: uma lente alternativa ao pensamento econômico-racionalista. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; 4(9), 79-99, 2010.
COVALESKI, M. A.; DIRSMITH, M. W. An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and fall of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly; 33, 562-582, 1988.
COVALESKI, M. A.; DIRSMITH, M.W.; SAMUEL, S. Manageral accounting research: the contributions of organizational and sociological theories. Journal of management accouting research; 8, 1-35, 1996.
COVALESKI, M.; EVANS, J. H.; LUFT, J.; SHIELDS, M. D. Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research; 2, 587-624, 2006.
DANI, A. C.; ZONATTO, V. C. S.; DIEHL, C. A. Participação orçamentária e desempenho gerencial: uma meta-análise das relações encontradas em pesquisas desenvolvidas na área comportamental da contabilidade. Advances in scientific e applied accounting; (10)1, 54-72, 2017.
DIMAGGIO, P. J; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review; 48, 147-160, 1983.
FREZATTI, F.; BECK, F.; SILVA, J. O. Percepções sobre a criação de reservas orçamentárias em processo orçamentário participativo. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 7(4), 335-354, 2013.
GUERREIRO, M. S.; RODRIGUES, L. L.; CRAIG, R. Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – Institutional logics and strategic responses. Accounting, Organizations and Society; 37, 482-499, 2012.
HANSEN, S.; OTLEY, D.; VAN DER STEDE, W. Practice developments in budgeting: an overview and research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research; 15, 95–116, 2003.
HEINZMANN, L. M.; LAVARDA, C. E. F. Cultura organizacional e o processo de planejamento e controle orçamentário. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações; (5)13, 4-19, 2011.
ITTNER, C.; LARCKER, D.; MEYER, M. Subjectivity and weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review; 3(78), 725-758, 2003.
IRVINE, H. Balancing money and mission in a local church budget. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 18(2), 211-237, 2005.
JONES, C.; REAY, T. Qualitatively capturing institucional logics. Strategic Organization; 14(4), 441-454, 2016.
LUKES, S. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work ¬ A Historical and Critical Study. England: Penguin Books, 1977.
MARTINS, G. D. A.; THEÓPHILO, C. R. Metodologia da investigação cientifica. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
MATTOS, P. L. C. L. Estudo de caso qualitativo. In GODOI, C. K.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; SILVA, A. B. (Orgs.), Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006. pp. 366- 370.
MUCCI, D. M.; FREZATTI, F.; DIENG, M. As múltiplas funções do orçamento empresarial. Revista de Administração Contemporânea; 20(3), 285-303, 2016.
OTLEY, D. Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research; 10(4), 363-382, 1999.
PARISI, C.; MEGLIORINI, E. (Orgs.). Contabilidade Gerencial. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011.
POPIK, F.; LAVARDA, C. E. F. Contradições institucionais, práxis e mudança do controle gerencial: estudo de caso em uma cooperativa. Anais do XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Custos; Natal, RN, Brasil. Recuperado de: https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/viewFile/3672/3673, 2014.
RIXON, D.; ROIS, J.; FASERUK, A. The Seven Deadly Sins of Chrurch Accounting. Journal of Business Diversity; 14(1), 9-17, 2014.
RUSSO, P. T. A institucionalização do Balanced Scorecard pelas organizações: o caso SABESP Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis). Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado - FECAP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2011.
RUSSO, P. T. Comportamento do uso de práticas de Contabilidade Gerencial sob a ótica institucional. Tese (Doutorado em Controladoria e Contabilidade). Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2015.
RUSSO, P. T.; GUERREIRO, R. Percepção sobre a sociomaterialidade das práticas de contabilidade gerencial. Revista de Administração de Empresas FGV EAESP; 57(6), 567-584, 2017.
SÁ-SILVA, J. R.; DE ALMEIDA, C. D.; GUINDANI, J. F. Pesquisa documental: pistas teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Brasileira de História e Ciências Sociais, 1(1), 2009.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage, 2001.
SEO, M.G. E.; CREED, W. E. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review; 27(2), 222-247, 2002.
STOCK, S. Church Reporting Made Easy. Management Accounting; 76(9), 56-59, 1995.
STRANG, D.; MEYER, J. W. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society; 22(4), 487-511, 1993.
TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880 – 1935. Administrative Science Quarterly; 28(1) 1983, 22-39, 1983.
TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G. A institucionalização da teoria institucional. In: CLEGG, S.; HARDY, C.; NORDY, W. Handbook de estudos organizacionais (Humberto F. Martins e Regina Luna S. Cardoso, Trad.). São Paulo: Atlas, 1999. pp.196-219.
WANDERLEY, C. A.; SOEIRO, T. M. Contradição Institucional e o Balanced Scorecard: um caso de mudança sem sucesso. Revista Universo Contábil; 12(1), 45-65, 2016.
WRUBEL, F.; TOIGO, L. A.; LAVARDA, C. E. F. Mudanças nas rotinas contábeis: contradições institucionais e práxis humanas. RACE, Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia; 14(3), p. 1175-1204, 26, 2015.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 3a ed.. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
ZIETLOW, J. Capital and Operating Budgeting practices in Pure Nonprofit Organizations. Financial Accountability and Management; 5(4), 219-32, 1988.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright for papers published in this journal belong to the author, with rights of first publication for the journal. As the papers appears in this publicly accessed journal, the papers are for free use, receiving their credit, in educational and non-commercial uses. The journal will allow the use of the papers published for non-commercial purposes, including the right to send the paper to publicly accessed databases.
