THE AUDIT OF SUBSEQUENT EVENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPORTANCE FROM THE VIEW OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ACTING IN BRAZILIAN OPEN CAPITAL COMPANIES

Authors

Keywords:

Audit, Subsequent events, Independent Auditors

Abstract

The present study investigates the importance that Brazilian independent auditors working at B3 (Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão) attach to subsequent events. For this purpose, we divided the second-order latent variable “importance” into three subgroups that form the research construct: the importance of the information generated; the importance of evidence-seeking procedures before the issuance of the audit report; and the importance of evidence-seeking procedures after the issuance of the audit report and publication of the financial statements. The data collection of this quantitative, descriptive and survey took place in the first half of 2018, the final sample had 74 participants (21.08% of the population), and the answers were analyzed with the help of the R Development Core Team statistical environment, using the Structural Equations Model (SEM) to handle the data. The research contributes by verifying the levels of importance attributed by auditors in the audit work of subsequent events, thus visualizing their relationship with the service provided. The results show that the Brazilian independent auditors consider the information generated and the procedures for searching for subsequent events important, except when the generated information changes only one account of the financial statements (low relevance). Another finding of the research was that, between meeting the deadlines and issuing quality information, the evidence found in the study indicates that auditors prefer to comply with legal deadlines. The research also sought to analyze if professional characteristics influence the level of information they attribute to subsequent events. In this sense, we identified that the experience time, the level of effort involved in the audit procedures, and the difficulties in the search processes positively influence the importance of the factor performed procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernanda Mazzaro Mucillo, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Mestra em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Claudio Marques, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Doutorado em Controladoria e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Professor da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Daniel Ramos Nogueira, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

Doutorado em Controladoria e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Professor da Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

References

Asparouhov, T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural equation modeling, 12(3), 411-434.

Bec, N. R. (2009). To what extent are disclosures of subsequent events adopted by Private Equity companies. Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis, Faculty of Economics and Econometrics, Universteit Van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Holland.

Cauchi, M. (2016). An analysis of the audit of subsequent events in the local scenario. Master's thesis, University of Malta, Tal-Qroqq, Msida, Malta.

Chung, J. O., Cullinan, C. P., Frank, M., Long, J. H., Mueller-Phillips, J., & O'Reilly, D. M. (2012). The auditor's approach to subsequent events: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), p. 167-207.

Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.

Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis - CPC. (2009). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 24 – Eventos Subsequentes.

Conselho Federal de Contabilidade – CFC. (2016). Normas Brasileiras de Contabilidade Técnicas de Auditoria Independente - NBC TA 560 (R1) – Auditoria de Eventos Subsequentes. Recuperado em 1 de julho de 2019, de http://www1.cfc.org.br/sisweb/ SRE/docs/NBCTA560(R1).pdf

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. S. (2016). Métodos de pesquisa em administração. (12. ed.) Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Fornell, C.; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, p. 39-50.

Gelbcke, E. R., Santos, A., Iudícibus, S, Martins, E. (2018). Manual de contabilidade societária. São Paulo: Atlas.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.

Hair, J. F.; Hult, T. M.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE.

Hendriksen, E. S., & Van Breda, M. F. (2012). Teoria da contabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, p. 521-522.

Herda, D. N., & Lavelle, J. J. (2014). Auditing Subsequent Events: Perspectives from the Field. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), p. A10-A24.

Hodge, D. R.; Gillespie, D. F. (2003). Phrase completion: an alternative to Likert scales. Social Work Research, 27 (1), p. 45-55.

Hughes, C. (2006). Qualitative and quantitative approaches: to social research. University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, United Kingdom.

Janvrin, D. J., & Jeffrey, C. G. (2007). An investigation of auditor perceptions about subsequent events and factors that influence this audit task. Accounting Horizons, 21(3), p. 295-312.

Köche, J. C. (2012). Fundamentos de metodologia científica: teoria da ciência e iniciação à pesquisa. (30. ed.) Petrópolis/RJ: Vozes.

Li, Q. (2013). A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(5), p. 1609-1618.

Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações. ReportNumber: Pêro Pinheiro.

Martins, E. A. (2014). OCPC 07: Menor Volume e Maior Relevância para as Notas Explicativas. Revista FIPECAFI: São Paulo.

Michels, J. (2017). Disclosure versus recognition: Inferences from subsequent events. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), p. 3-34.

Nawaiseh, M. A. L., & Jaber, J. (2015). Auditing subsequent events from the perspective of auditors: study from Jordan. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(3), p. 78-85.

Ozdemir, Z., & Gokcen, B. A. (2016). Auditing of Subsequent Events: A Survey of Auditors in the City of Istanbul in Turkey. Accounting and Finance Research, 5(2), p. 42-53.

Petty, R. E., S. C. Wheeler, & Z. L. Tormala. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 5: Personality and social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Stuart, I. C. (2014). Serviços de auditoria e asseguração na prática. Porto Alegre: AMGH Editora.

Published

2022-07-15

Issue

Section

National Section