ACCOUNTING AS BRANCH OF KNOWLEDGE: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE
Keywords:
Accounting, Branch of Knowledge, Science, Technology, Practice.Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize the accounting as branch of knowledge in three different fields: science, technology and practice. Through theoretical essay, we was argued that, although distinct, these fields interact, in that, as epistemology that justified the analysis here undertaken, the practical activities may be technology subject matter and that to be effective if based on one or more sciences. The difference between science and technology is given by the nature of knowledge. While science studies how the reality or the facts occur naturally and socially, technology devises ways to change or interfere in reality targeting certain goals. Suggests that while scientific accounting studies the events and processes that change the wealth between agents and between periods, technological accounting develops means to interfere in the generation and control of wealth for resource allocation purposes in the economy, distribution of results and planning and control the performance of individual or organizational agents. The result of this essay indicate that as science area also has the challenge to develop towards the construction of scientific theories can explain and predict a set of circumscribed facts in its scientific study object, this subject matter distinct from the technological object. A contribution of the distinction between science and technology, presented in this study, is its use to settle the dispute between normative accounting and positive accounting. Other contributions are as follows: the possibility of research into the interactions between the three fields and studies on the content and methods in training researchers, technologists and professionals of the accounting practice.
Downloads
References
ABDEL-KHALIK, A Rashad; AJINKYA, Bipin B. Empirical research in accounting: a methodological viewpoint. American Accounting Association e University of Florida, 1979.
BACCOUCHE, Chedli. Towards an Accounting Science. Managerial Finance. v. 18, 1992.
BALL, Ray. International Financing Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research. Kingston Upon Thames: 2006. p. 5. Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=929561. Acesso em 13/09/2015.
BUNGE, Mário. Epistemologia: curso de atualização. Tradução de Cláudio Navarra. 2ª ed. São Paulo: T. A. Queiroz: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 1980.
____________ Philosophy of Science: from problem to theory. Vol. 1. Rev. ed. of: Scientific research. Berlin, New York: Springer-Velag, 1967, 2 vols. London: Transaction Publishers, 1998a.
____________ Philosophy of Science: from explanation to justification. Vol. 2. Rev. ed. of: Scientific research. Berlin, New York: Springer-Velag, 1967, 2 vols. London: Transaction Publishers, 1998b.
____________ Social Science under Debate: a philosophical perspective. London: University of Toronto Press, 1998c.
____________ Dicionário de Filosofia. Tradução Gita K. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perpectiva, 2006.
____________ Teoria e Realidade. Trad. Gita K. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2008.
BUSHMAN, Robert M.; PIOTROSKI, Joseph D. and SMITH, Abbie J. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research. v. 42, n. 2, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x
CUPANI, Alberto. A tecnologia como problema filosófico: três enfoques. Scientiae Studia, v. 2, n. 4, p. 493-518, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400003
CHUA, Wai Fong. Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review. v. 61, out. 1986.
DEMSKI, J. S. Is Accounting an Academic Discipline? Accounting Horizons. v. 21, n. 2, jun. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.153
FIELDS, Thomas D.; LYS, Thomas Z.; VINCENT, Linda. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, 2001, p. 255-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
HENDRIKSEN, Eldon; BREDA, Michael F. Van. Teoria da Contabilidade. Trad. da 5ª ed. Americana por Antônio Zoratto Sanvicente. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
HOLTHAUSEN, Robert W. e WATTS, Ross L. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, 2001, p. 3-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00029-5
KAM, Vernon. Accounting Theory. 2ª ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
LACEY, Hugh. Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding. 2ª ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.
LARCKER, David F.; RICHARDSON, Scott A.; TUNA, A. Irem. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Accounting Review. v. 82, n. 4, p. 963-1008, jul. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.963
MATTESSICH, Richard. Critique of Accounting: examination of the foundations and normative structure of an applied discipline. Westport-USA: Quorum Books, 1995.
____________ Academic Research in Accounting: The Last 50 Years. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting. v. 3, jul. 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10293574.1996.10510486
MAUTZ, R. K. Accounting as a Social Science. The Accounting Review. abr. 1963.
MORGAN, Gareth. Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting Organizations and Society. v. 13, n. 5, p. 477-485, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90018-9
MOST, Keneth. S. Accounting Theory. 2ª ed. Columbus, Ohio: Grid Publishing, Inc. 1982.
NOBES, Christopher. Towards a General Model of the Reasons for International Differences in Financial Reporting. ABACUS: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, v. 34, n. 2, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00028
OSTERHOLM, Magnus. The role of theory when studying epistemological characterizations of mathematics lecture(r)s. The Mathematics Enthusiast, ISSN 1551-3440, v. 9, n.3, p. 431-464, 2012.
PENMAN, Stephen, H. Financial Forecasting, Risk and Valuation: Accounting for the Future. ABACUS: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, v. 46, n. 2, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00316.x
POPPER, Karl. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinsons, 1959.
____________ Lógica das Ciências Sociais. 2ª Ed. Trad. de Estevão de Rezende Martins, Apio Cláudio Muniz Acquarone Filho, Vilma de Oliveira Moraes e Silva. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo brasileiro, 1999.
ROBERTS, Alan. The Very Idea of Classification in International Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society. v. 20, n. 7/8, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00008-W
RYAN, Bob; SCAPENS, Robert W.; THEOBALD, Michael. Research Method & Methodology in Finance & Accounting. 2 ed.. Singapure: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2002.
SHACKELFORD, Douglas A.; SHEVLIN, Terry. Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, 2001, p. 321-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2
SCHMIDT, Paulo. A classificação da contabilidade dentre os ramos do conhecimento humano. Cadernos de Estudos - São Paulo - FIPECAFI, v.10, n. 17, p. 9-22, jan./abr., 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-92511998000100001
STAMP, Edward. Why Can Accounting Not Become a Science Like Physics? Abacus: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, v. 17, n. 1, 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1981.tb00098.x
STERLING, Robert R. Toward a Science of Accounting. Financial Analysts Journal, September/October, 1975.
____________ Accounting at the Crossroads. Journal of Accountancy, August 1976.
____________ Toward a Science of Accounting. Scholars Book Company, Houston 1979.
WAGENHOFER, A. Towards a theory of accounting regulation: A discussion of the politics of disclosure regulation along the economic cycle. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 52, p. 228-234, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.08.006
ZIMMERMAN, Jerold L. Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 32, 2001, p. 411-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00023-4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright for papers published in this journal belong to the author, with rights of first publication for the journal. As the papers appears in this publicly accessed journal, the papers are for free use, receiving their credit, in educational and non-commercial uses. The journal will allow the use of the papers published for non-commercial purposes, including the right to send the paper to publicly accessed databases.