ACCOUNTING CHOICES IN INVESTIMENT PROPERTIES

Authors

  • Maria Elisabeth Moreira Carvalho Andrade Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
  • Denise Mendes da Silva Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
  • Rodrigo Fernandes Malaquias Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.20139

Keywords:

accounting choices, investment properties, fair value, cost method.

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the accounting choices of companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA, upon adoption of CPC 28 - Investment Property - correlated standard IAS 40 - Investment Property. The standard allows the choice of alternative methods for assessment of investment properties: fair value method or the cost method. Thus companies similar may have statements differentiated. This is a descriptive, documentary and predominantly quantitative research. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate technique of logistic regression analysis. Of the 39 companies selected, 17 (44%) adopted the fair value method and the remaining 22 companies (56%) opted for the cost method. The descriptive analysis allowed us to observe, also, the amount that was off balance sheet in the case of companies that have chosen the cost method. With regard to multivariate analysis, it was evidence that the variables selected for the study, seemed to present no statistically significant relationship with the valuation method chosen by the companies. You should take into consideration that 2009 and 2010 were the first years of using CPC 28, as well as the other Accounting Pronouncements, fully, and this fact may have influenced the results found. Another important point is about the Brazilian capital market, which is quite different from foreign markets, where similar studies have been conducted. Therefore conclusions and comparisons with the results should be made with caution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maria Elisabeth Moreira Carvalho Andrade, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

Denise Mendes da Silva, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

Rodrigo Fernandes Malaquias, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

References

ALBANEZ, Tatiana; VALLE, Maurício Ribeiro. Impactos da Assimetria de Informação na estrutura de capital de empresas brasileiras abertas. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças – USP, São Paulo, v. 20, n. 51, p. 6-27, set/dez. 2009. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-70772009000300002.

ANDRADE, Maria Margarida de. Como preparar trabalhos para cursos de pós-graduação: noções práticas. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

BARTH, Mary E. Global Financial Reporting: Implications for U.S. Academics. The Accounting Review, v. 83, n.5, p. 1159–79, 2008. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.5.1159.

RAUPP, Fabiano Maury; BEUREN, Ilse Maria. Metodologia da Pesquisa Aplicável às Ciências Sociais. In: BEUREN, Ilse Maria. (org.) Como elaborar trabalhos monográficos em Contabilidade: teoria e prática. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004. Cap. 3.

CHATHAM, Michael D.; LARSON, Robert K.; VIETZE, Axel. Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, v. 26, n. 1, p. 97–107, jun. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2010.03.002.

CHRISTENSEN, Hans B.; NIKOLAEV, Valeri. Does Fair Value Accounting for Non-financial Assets Pass the Market Test? Working Paper n. 09-12, University of Chicago, 2010.

COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. EU Implementation of IFRS and the Fair Value Directive. 2007. Disponível em: < http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/studies/2007-eu_implementation_of_ifrs.pdf >. Acesso em 10 jan. 2012.

CPC – Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. Propriedade para Investimento. Pronunciamento Técnico CPC-28. Disponível. em: <http://www.cpc.org.br/>. Aprovado em 26 de junho de 2009.

DEMARIA, Samira; DUFOUR, Dominique. First time adoption of IFRS, Fair value option, Conservatism: Evidences from French listed companies. 2007. Disponível em: <http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/26/61/89/PDF/First_adoption_and_fair_value_ Demaria_Dufour.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2012.

DIETRICH, J. Richard; HARRYS, Mary S.; MULLER, Karl. A. The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 30, p. 125 – 158, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00002-7.

FÁVERO, Luiz Paulo et al. Análise de Dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009.

FIELDS, Thomas D.; LYS, Thomas Z.; VINCENT, Linda. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 31, p. 255 – 307, 2001. DOI: S0165-4101(01)00028-3.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como Elaborar um Projeto de Pesquisa. São Paulo Atlas, 2003.

HAIL, Luzi; LEUZ, Christian; WYSOCKI, Peter D. Global Accounting Convergence and the Potential Adoption of IFRS by the United States: An Analysis of Economic and Policy Factors. 2009. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1357331>. Acesso em: 03 jan. 2012. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1357331.

HERRMANN, Don; SAUDAGARAN, Shahrokh M.; THOMAS, Wayne B. The Quality of Fair Value Measures for Property, Plant, and Equipment. Accounting Forum, v. 30, p. 43-59. mar. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2005.09.001.

HOLTHAUSEN, Robert. W.; LEFTWICH, Richard W. The Economic consequences of accounting choice: implications of costly contracting e monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 5, p. 77 – 117, 1983. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1.

IQUIAPAZA, Roberto Aldo; LAMOUNIER, Wagner Moura; AMARAL, Hudson Fernandes. Assimetria de informações e pagamentos de proventos na Bovespa. Munich Personal RePEc Arquive – MPRA Paper, n. 1673, nov. 2007. Disponível em: <http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1673/>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2012.

LAUX, Christian; LEUZ, Christian. The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society. v. 34, p. 826 – 834, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.003.

LOPES, Alexsandro Broedel; ALENCAR, Roberta Carvalho de. Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital in Emerging Markets: the Brazilian case. The International Journal of Accounting, v.45, p. 443-464, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.09.003.

MULLER, Karl. A.; RIEDL, Edward J.; SELLHORN, T. Causes and Consequences of

Choosing Historical Cost versus Fair Value. may. 2008. Disponível em: <http://nd.edu/~carecob/May2008Conference/Papers/RiedlMRS03062008.pdf >. Acesso em 13 jan. 2012.

______. Mandatory Fair Value Accounting and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the European Real Estate Industry. Management Science, v. 57, p. 1138 – 1153, 2011. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1339.

POSNER, Richard A. Theories of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, v. 5, p. 335 – 358, Autumn, 1974.

QUAGLI, A.; AVALLONE, F. Fair Value or Cost Model? Drivers of Choice for IAS 40 in the Real Estate Industry. European Accounting Review, v. 19, n. 3, p. 461 – 493, 2010. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2010.496547.

SHAFFER, Sanders. Fair value accounting: Villain or innocent victim. Exploring the links between fair value accounting, bank regulatory capital and the recent financial crisis. The Quantitative Analysis Unit of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Working paper n.10-1, jan. 2010. Disponível em: <http://bostonfed.org/bankinfo/qau/wp/2010/qau1001.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 jan. 2012

ZUELCH, Henning; NELLESSEN, Thomas. The Reliability of Investiment Property Fair Values Under. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, v. 29, i. 1, p. 59 – 73, 2010. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1609702.

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

Andrade, M. E. M. C., Silva, D. M. da, & Malaquias, R. F. (2013). ACCOUNTING CHOICES IN INVESTIMENT PROPERTIES. Revista Universo Contábil, 9(3), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.20139

Issue

Section

National Section