MODERATING EFFECT OF THE COSTS STRUCTURE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ASYMMETRIC BEHAVIOR OF COSTS AND PROFITABILITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2022120

Keywords:

Cost Structure, Asymmetric Cost Behavior, Profitability

Abstract

This research aimed to verify the moderating role of the cost structure in the relationship between the asymmetric behavior of costs and the profitability of companies. We used panel data regressions and two cost structure measures to analyze the results' robustness rating effect of the cost structure on the relationship between cost asymmetry and contemporary profitability for companies in the industrial goods, as well as for the asymmetry of costs and future profitability of the industrial goods and cyclical consumption industry. These results add knowledge to the previous findings by showing that companies that presented a behavior of high-cost asymmetry had higher average profitability in the presence of a high proportion of fixed costs. It indicates that a higher proportion of fixed costs in the cost structure reverses the negative effect of cost asymmetry on profitability due to the moderating effect. We also observed the highest level of profitability in a scenario of lower cost asymmetry and a lower proportion of fixed costs. The empirical evidence indicates that the minimization of the asymmetric behavior of costs is relevant, especially for companies with a low proportion of fixed costs, since there is a negative relationship between the asymmetric behavior of costs and profitability. These results are important for managers to analyze and compare their company's position in relation to competitors regarding the efficiency level in adjusting costs to variations in demand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboody, D., Levi, S., & Weiss, D. (2018). Managerial incentives, options, and cost-structure choices. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), 422-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9432-0
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D. & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky"?. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2007). Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0702200103
Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. (2010). Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26 (2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50831
Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M. J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does capacity utilization affect the "stickiness" of cost?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900303
Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50846
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D. & Plehn–Dujowich, J. M. (2010). Sticky cost behavior: Theory and evidence. AAA 2011 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1659493
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Chen, Z., Harford, J. & Kamara, A. (2019). Operating leverage, profitability, and capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54, 1, 369-392.
Chung, C. Y., Hur, S. K., & Liu, C. (2019). Institutional investors and cost stickiness: Theory and evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.05.002
Faia, V. S., & Vieira, V. A. (2018). Efeitos moderadores duplos e triplos e plots em análise de regressão. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 11(4), 812-830.
Golden, J., Mashruwala, R., & Pevzner, M. (2020). Labor adjustment costs and asymmetric cost behavior: An extension. Management Accounting Research, 46, 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.004
Grejo, L. M., Abbas, K., Camacho, R. R., & Junqueira, E. (2019). A influência do ativo imobilizado no comportamento assimétrico dos custos. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 16(38), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n38p35
Guerra, A. R., Rocha, W., & Corrar, L. J. (2007). Análise do impacto das variações de receitas nos lucros das empresas com diferentes estruturas de custos. RAUSP: Management Journal, 42(2), 227-238.
Melo, J. A. S., Wencel, S. L. S. S., Marques, K. C. M., & Abbas, K. (2020). Sticky costs no segmento de vestuário: Estudo sob o olhar da análise de custos de concorrentes. Anais do USP International Conference in Accounting, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Porporato, M., & Werbin, E. (2012). Evidence of sticky costs in banks of Argentina, Brazil and Canada. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 5(4), 303–320. http://www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id=48834
Richartz, F., Borgert, A., & Lunkes, R. J. (2014). Comportamento assimétrico dos custos nas empresas brasileiras listadas na BM&FBOVESPA. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 7 (3), 339-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2014070302
Souza, B. C., Rocha, W., & Souza, R. P. (2010). Desempenho econômico superior: Um estudo sobre a estrutura de custos e despesas no setor de energia elétrica. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Custos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, 17.
Warganegara, D.L., & Tamara, D. (2014). The impacts of cost stickiness on the profitability of Indonesian firms. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 8(11), 3606-3609.
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts' earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

Issue

Vol. 18 (2022)

Section

National Section

License

The copyright for papers published in this journal belong to the author, with rights of first publication for the journal. As the papers appears in this publicly accessed journal, the papers are for free use, receiving their credit, in educational and non-commercial uses. The journal will allow the use of the papers published for non-commercial purposes, including the right to send the paper to publicly accessed databases.