NON-AUDIT SERVICES AND AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE IN AN ENVIRONMENT OF LOW INVESTOR PROTECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.20164107-127Palavras-chave:
Audit fees, Non-audit services, Auditor independence, Corporate governance.Resumo
This paper aims to evaluate whether the provision of non-audit services (NASs) affects external auditor independence in an environment characterised by low legal protection of minority investors and a high concentration of ownership and control. Audit reports and costs of services are analysed over 3 years for 154 Brazilian companies. The binary variable proxy for independence indicates a qualified auditor's report and, as an alternative specification, the issuing of a going concern opinion. Logit models were employed with control variables to identify aspects related to other sources of threats to independence, management influence, and the effort and risk of auditing services. The results indicate that the provision of NASs does not affect auditor independence. This evidence is robust in terms of the alternative specification of the independence proxy and the observation of a subset of companies considered qualifiable. Only when summed to audit fees is there evidence of a negative impact on independence, signalling that the client’s economic dependence might be more relevant than NAS with respect to auditor independence. This result is robust to both independence proxies and the subset of qualifiable companies. In general, other sources of threats do not seem related to independence. This study provides evidence of a market in which auditor independence is expected to be compromised, given controlling shareholders’ influence on company management.Â
Downloads
Referências
ANTLE, R. Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–20, 1984.
BASIOUDIS, I. G.; PAPAKONSTANTINOU, E.; GEIGER, M. A. Audit Fees, Non-Audit Fees and Auditor Going-Concern Reporting Decisions in the United Kingdom. Abacus, v. 44, n. 3, p. 284–309, set. 2008.
BUTLER, M.; LEONE, A. J.; WILLENBORG, M. An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 37, n. 2, p. 139–165, jun. 2004.
CAHAN, S. F. et al. Damaged Auditor Reputation and Analysts’ Forecast Revision Frequency. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, v. 32, n. 1, p. 33–60, fev. 2013.
CALLAGHAN, J.; PARKASH, M.; SINGHAL, R. Goingâ€Concern Audit Opinions and the Provision of Nonaudit Services: Implications for Auditor Independence of Bankrupt Firms. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, v. 28, n. 1, p. 153–169, maio 2009.
CHEN, S.; SUN, S. Y. J.; WU, D. Client Importance, Institutional Improvements, and Audit Quality in China: An Office and Individual Auditor Level Analysis. The Accounting Review, v. 85, n. 1, p. 127–158, jan. 2010.
COMISSÃO DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS - CVM. Instrução CVM no 480, de 7 de dezembro de 2009. Rio de Janeiro, 2009.
CONSELHO FEDERAL DE CONTABILIDADE - CFC. Normas brasileiras de contabilidade: NBC PA – do auditor independente: NBC PA 01, 11, 12, 13, 290 e 291 e Resolução CFC 1.019/05. Brasília-DF, 2012.
CONSELHO FEDERAL DE CONTABILIDADE - CFC. Resolução n.0 1.374 de 08 de Dezembro de 2011. Brasília-DF, 2011.
CRASWELL, A.; STOKES, D. J.; LAUGHTON, J. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 33, n. 2, p. 253–275, jun. 2002.
CRASWELL, A. T. Does the Provision of Non-Audit Services Impair Auditor Independence? International Journal of Auditing, v. 3, n. 1, p. 29–40, mar. 1999.
DAMASCENA, L. G.; PAULO, E.; CAVALCANTE, P. R. N. Divergências entre Parágrafos de Ressalva e Parágrafos de Ênfase nos Pareceres de Auditoria. Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ, v. 16, n. 2, p. 50–66, 18 out. 2011.
DANTAS, J. A. et al. Concentração de Auditoria no Mercado de Capitais Brasileiro. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 6, n. 14, p. 4–21, 21 jun. 2012.
DEANGELO, L. E. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 3, n. 3, p. 183–199, dez. 1981.
DEFOND, M. L.; RAGHUNANDAN, K.; SUBRAMANYAM, K. R. Do Non–Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 40, n. 4, p. 1247–1274, 2002.
DOPUCH, N.; KING, R. R.; SCHWARTZ, R. Independence in Appearance and in Fact: An Experimental Investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 20, n. 1, p. 79–114, 2003.
FIRTH, M. Auditor-Provided Consultancy Services and their Associations with Audit Fees and Audit Opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, v. 29, n. 5&6, p. 661–693, jun. 2002.
FIRTH, M. The Provision of Nonaudit Services by Accounting Firms to their Audit Clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 14, n. 2, p. 1–21, jun. 1997.
FRANCIS, J. R.; KRISHNAN, J. Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 16, n. 1, p. 135–165, mar. 1999.
GEIGER, M. A.; RAGHUNANDAN, K. Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, v. 21, n. 1, p. 67–78, mar. 2002.
GRAMLING, A. A.; RITTENBERG, L. E.; JOHNSTONE, K. M. Auditoria. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2012.
GRIFFIN, P. A.; LONT, D. H.; SUN, Y. Corporate Governance and Audit Fees: Evidence of Countervailing Relations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 18–49, jun. 2008.
HAY, D.; KNECHEL, R.; LI, V. Non-audit Services and Auditor Independence: New Zealand Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, v. 33, n. 5-6, p. 715–734, jun. 2006.
JENSEN, M. C.; MECKLING, W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305–360, out. 1976.
JOHNSTONE, K. M.; WARFIELD, T. D.; SUTTON, M. H. Antecedents and Consequences of Independence Risk: Framework for Analysis. Accounting Horizons, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1–18, mar. 2001.
LI, C. Does Client Importance Affect Auditor Independence at the Office Level? Empirical Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 26, n. 1, p. 201–230, 1 abr. 2009.
MARTINEZ, A. L.; REIS, G. M. R. Audit Firm Rotation and Earnings Management in Brazil. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 4, n. 10, p. 48–64, 1 dez. 2010.
MUTCHLER, J. F.; HOPWOOD, W.; MCKEOWN, J. M. The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors in audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 35, n. 2, p. 295–310, 1997.
REYNOLDS, J. K.; FRANCIS, J. R. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 30, n. 3, p. 375–400, dez. 2000.
SHARMA, D. S.; SIDHU, J. Professionalism vs Commercialism: The Association Between Non-Audit Services (NAS) and Audit Independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, v. 28, n. 5-6, p. 563–594, jun. 2001.
SIMUNIC, D. A. Auditing, Consulting, and Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 22, n. 2, p. 679–702, 1984.
STERNBERG, L.; LEAL, R. P. C.; BORTOLON, P. M. Affinities and agreements among major Brazilian shareholders. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, v. 8, n. 3, p. 213–228, ago. 2011.
WATTS, R. L.; ZIMMERMAN, J. L. Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: Oct., 1983 / Copyright © 1983 The University of Chicago, v. 26, n. 3, p. 613–633, 1 out. 1983.
WATTS, R. L.; ZIMMERMAN, J. L. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1986.
WATTS, R. L.; ZIMMERMAN, J. L. The Markets for Independence and Independent Auditors. Working Paper. Center for Research in Governement Policy & Business: Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, 1981.
WINES, G. Auditor Independence, Audit Qualifications and the Provision of Non-Audit Services: A Note. Accounting & Finance, v. 34, n. 1, p. 75–86, 25 fev. 1994.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os direitos autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais. A revista permitirá o uso dos trabalhos publicados para fins não-comerciais, incluindo direito de enviar o trabalho para bases de dados de acesso público. Os artigos publicados são de total e exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação;
• O(s) autor(es) declaram que o artigo não possui conflitos de interesse.
