INTELLIGIBILITY VS READABILITY: UNDERSTANDABILITY MEASURES OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2020209Palavras-chave:
Readability, Intelligibility, Financial Information, Notes to the financial statements.Resumo
Decision-making is influenced by information, which must be understood so it can be useful. However, measuring understandability is not a simple task. Previous studies use readability metrics as proxies for understandability, but readability is a shallow metric ignoring discourse and language components. This research analyzes the notes to the financial statements using intelligibility metrics, an alternative to readability measures. Our sample comprised 44 Brazilian firms that presented their Portuguese notes (native language) and English (non-native) from 2012 to 2015. Focusing on the notes of Financial Instruments and Provisions, we found that, for most indexes where firms had worse readability levels, they showed better intelligibility levels. It indicates that both metrics measure different things. Our results also indicated that language impacts these metrics and that firms did not improve their information quality after the guideline OCPC 07 from the Brazilian Accounting Standards Committee.
Downloads
Referências
Barth, M., Landsman, W., & Lang, M. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.
Bloomfield, R. (2008). Discussion of ‘‘annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence’’. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 248– 252.
Coh-Metrix-Port Website. (2017). Coh-Metrix-Port tool. Fonte: http://143.107.183.175:22680/
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis – CPC. (2 de Dezembro de 2011). Pronunciamento conceitual básico (R1): estrutura conceitual para elaboração e divulgação de relatório contábil-financeiro. Fonte: Site do CPC: http://www.cpc.org.br
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis – CPC. (26 de Setembro de 2014). Orientação técnica OCPC 07 - evidenciação na divulgação dos relatórios contábil-financeiros de propósito geral. Fonte: Site do CPC: http://www.cpc.org.br/CPC/Documentos-Emitidos/Orientacoes/Orientacao?Id=95
Dreyer, L. G. (1984). Readability and responsibility. Journal of Reading, 27(4), 334-338.
Evans, L., Baskerville, R., & Nara, K. (2015). Colliding worlds: issues relating to language translation in accounting and some lesson from other disciplines. ABACUS, 51(1), 1-36.
EY. (2016). SEC comments and trends: An analysis of current reporting issues. U.S. Professional Practice Group.
Finatto, M. J. (2011). Complexidade textual em artigos científicos: contribuições para o estudo do texto científico em português. Organon, 25(50), 30-45.
Gomes, M., Ferreira, R., & Martins, V. (2018). O impacto da OCPC 07 sobre o tamanho e a legibilidade das notas explicativas de companhias brasileiras. Revista Universo Contábil, 14(2), 162-184.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193-202.
Guay, W., Samuels, D., & Taylor, D. (2016). Guiding through the Fog: Financial statement complexity and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62, 234-269.
Jones, M. J. (1997). Methodological themes: critical appraisal of the cloze procedure's use in the accounting domain. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(1), 105-128.
Jones, M., & Smith, M. (2014). Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(1), 183-208.
Klare, G. R. (1974-1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(1), 62-102.
Kumar, G. (2014). Determinants of readability of financial reports of US-listed Asian companies. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 1-18.
Lawrence, A. (2013). Individual investors and financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 130-147.
Leffa, V. J. (1996). Aspectos da leitura: uma perspectiva psicolinguística. Porto Alegre: Sagra: DC Luzatto.
Lehavy, R., Li, F., & Merkley, K. (2011). The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 1087-1115.
Lewis, N. R., Parker, L. D., Pound, G. D., & Sutcliffe, P. (1986). Accounting report readability: The use of readability techniques. Accounting and Bussiness Research, 16(63), 199-213.
Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45 (2), 221-247.
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643-1671.
Lundholm, R., Rogo, R., & Zhang, J. (2014). Restoring the tower of babel: how foreign firms communicate with U.S. Investors. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1453-1485.
Martins, T. B., Ghiraldelo, C. M., Nunes, M. G., & Oliveira Junior, O. N. (1996). Readability formulas applied to textbooks in Brazilian portuguese. Notas do ICMSC-USP, Série Computação, 28.
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. Memphis: Project funded by the University of Memphis.
Merkley, K. J. (2014). Narrative disclosure and earnings performance: evidence from R&D disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 725-757.
Moreno, A., & Casasola, A. (2015). A readability evolution of narratives in annual reports: a longitudinal study of two Spanish companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29, 1-34.
Pasqualini, B., Scarton, C., & Finatto, M. (2011). Comparando avaliações de inteligibilidade textual entre originais e traduções de textos literários. 8th Brazilian Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.
Razik, T. A. (1969). A study of American newspaper readability. The Journal of Communication, 19, 317-324.
Rennekamp, K. (2012). Processing fluence and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1319-1354.
Rush, R. T. (1985). Assessing readability: formulas and alternatives. The Reading Teacher, 39(3), 274-283.
Santos, E., Calixto, L., & Bispo, M. (2019). Impacto da OCPC 07 no enxugamento das notas explicativas das companhias brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade e Finanças, 30(79), 58-72.
Scarton, C., Almeida, D., & Aluísio, S. (2010). Análise da inteligibilidade de textos via ferramentas de processamento de língua natural: adaptando as métricas do Coh-Metrix para o português. Linguamática, 2(1), 45-61.
Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating Text quality: the continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 238-255.
Smith, J., & Smith, N. (1971). Readability: a measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 552-561.
Smith, M., & Taffler, R. (1992). Readability and understandability: different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(4), 84-98.
Soper, F., & Dolphin Junior, R. (1964). Readability and corporate annual reports. The Accounting Review, 358-362.
Worthington, J. S. (1977). The readability of footnotes to financial statements and how to improve them. Journal of Reading, 20(6), 469-478.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os direitos autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais. A revista permitirá o uso dos trabalhos publicados para fins não-comerciais, incluindo direito de enviar o trabalho para bases de dados de acesso público. Os artigos publicados são de total e exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação;
• O(s) autor(es) declaram que o artigo não possui conflitos de interesse.
