SISTEMA DE MENSURAÇÃO DE DESEMPENHO, ESTRATÉGIAS GENÉRICAS E SUPORTE DO ECOSSISTEMA DE NEGÓCIOS: efeitos no desempenho de startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2022101Palavras-chave:
Sistema de mensuração de desempenho, Estratégias genéricas, Ecossistema de negócios, Startups, FsQCAResumo
Explorar elementos internos (controle e estratégia) e externos (suporte de ecossistemas) que contribuem para o sucesso das startups é uma demanda contemporânea da literatura. Diante disso, o estudo objetiva analisar as combinações entre uso (interativo e diagnóstico) do sistema de mensuração de desempenho (PMS), estratégias genéricas (liderança de custos e diferenciação) e suporte do ecossistema de negócios que levam startups ao alcance de alto ou baixo desempenho. A amostra contempla 101 startups sul brasileiras, e os dados são analisados por meio da fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Essa técnica permite compreender combinações de condições que são relevantes para determinado output. Os resultados sugerem que nenhuma condição, de maneira singular, é necessária para o alcance do alto desempenho. Entretanto, existem três (seis) combinações de condições que levam as startups a um alto (baixo) desempenho. Isso sugere vários caminhos que apresentam equifinalidade e que as startups se baseiam para alcançar resultados iguais. Os achados contribuem ao explorar as maneiras do uso (interativo ou diagnóstico) do PMS em startups, assim agregando novas evidências para o fluxo de estudos que analisou as práticas e sistemas de mensuração de desempenho nessas organizações. Além disso, o estudo postula a interface assimétrica entre o uso do PMS e as estratégias genéricas de Porter. Para a prática organizacional, são fornecidos insights sobre “receitas” que levam ao sucesso (alto desempenho), além de informações sobre configurações que levam a um fracasso (baixo desempenho). Isso é relevante para que gestores tomem decisões e atribuam ênfase adequada aos controles e a estratégia, dependendo de seu contexto e prioridades.
Downloads
Referências
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Ali, M., Kan, K.A.S., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5317-5323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.131
Álvarez-Coque, J.M.G., Mas-Verdú, F., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2017). Technological innovation versus non-technological innovation: different conditions in different regional contexts?. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1955-1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0394-2
Acquaah, M. (2013). Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.03.002
Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
Bedford, D.S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002
Beuren, I.M., & Oro, I.M. (2014). Relação entre estratégia de diferenciação e inovação, e sistemas de controle gerencial. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18, 285-310. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141394
Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. Pescadero, California: BookBaby.
Borsatto Junior, J.L., & Dal Vesco, D.G. (2020). Sistemas de controle gerencial como instrumento de poder sob a ótica de bourdieu. Revista Universo Contábil, 16(1), 27-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2020102
Carraro, W.B.W.H., Meneses, R., & Brito, C. (2019). Combining Categories of Management Control Tools for High Performance of Start-ups. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 21(4), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4022
Caseiro, N., & Coelho, A. (2019). The influence of Business Intelligence capacity, network learning and innovativeness on startups performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.009
Chenhall, R.H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: An empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00024-X
Costa, M.A.S., Guerino, G.C., Leal, G.C.L., Balancieri, R., & Galdamez, E.V.C. (2021). Exploring performance measurement practices in Brazilian startups. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1884063
Crespo, N.F., Curado, C., Oliveira, M., & Muñoz-Pascual, L. (2021). Entrepreneurial capital leveraging innovation in micro firms: A mixed-methods perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.001
Crespo, N.F., Rodrigues, R., Samagaio, A., & Silva, G.M. (2019). The adoption of management control systems by start-ups: Internal factors and context as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 101, 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.020
Cruz, A.P.C.da., Frare, A.B., Accadrolli, M.C., & Horz, V. (2022). Effects of informal controls and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202114660
Davila, A., Foster, G., & Jia, N. (2015). The valuation of management control systems in start-up companies: international field-based evidence. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 207-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.965720
Del Sarto, N., Isabelle, D.A., & Di Minin, A. (2020). The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups. Technovation, 90-91, 1-13, 102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102102
Dess, G.G., & Davis, P.S. (1984). Porter's (1980): generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.5465/256040
Felício, T., Samagaio, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.069
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
Fiss, P.C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Frare, A.B., & Beuren, I.M. (2020). Effects of information on job insecurity and work engagement in times of pandemic. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 60(6), 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020200604
Frare, A.B., & Beuren, I.M. (2021). Fostering individual creativity in startups: comprehensive performance measurement systems, role clarity and strategic flexibility. European Business Review, 33(6), 869-891. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2020-0262
Frare, A.B., & Beuren, I.M., Silva, E.S. (2022). Performance Measurement System, Organizational Learning, and Creativity. Brazilian Administration Review. 19(4), e210099.
Frare, A.B., Colombo, V.L.B., & Beuren, I.M. (2022). Performance measurement systems, environmental satisfaction, and green work engagement. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(90), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20211503.en
Fuster, E., Padilla-Meléndez, A., Lockett, N., & del-Águila-Obra, A. R. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020
Gerschewski, S., & Xiao, S.S. (2015). Beyond financial indicators: An assessment of the measurement of performance for international new ventures. International Business Review, 24(4), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.003
Gomez-Conde, J., Lopez-Valeiras, E., Malagueño, R., & Gonzalez-Castro, R. (2023). Management control systems and innovation strategies in business-incubated start-ups. Accounting and Business Research, 53(2), 210-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1986365
Greckhamer, T., & Gur, F.A. (2021). Disentangling combinations and contingencies of generic strategies: A set-theoretic configurational approach. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 1-18, 101951. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101951
Haseeb, M., Lis, M., Haouas, I., & Mihardjo, L. WW. (2019). The Mediating Role of Business Strategies between Management Control Systems Package and Firms Stability: Evidence from SMEs in Malaysia. Sustainability, 11(17), 1-20, 4705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174705
Henri, J.F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Jerónimo, H.M., Henriques, P.L., Lacerda, T.C., Silva, F.P., & Vieira, P.R. (2020). Going green and sustainable: The influence of green HR practices on the organizational rationale for sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 112, 413-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.036
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part 1. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
Kaya, B., Abubakar, A.M., Behravesh, E., Yildiz, H., & Mert, I.S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, 278-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016
King, R., Clarkson, P.M., & Wallace, S. (2010). Budgeting practices and performance in small healthcare businesses. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.11.002
Kulkov, I., Hellström, M., & Wikström, K. (2021). Identifying the role of business accelerators in the developing business ecosystem: the life science sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1459-1479. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0139
Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(95)00040-2
Langfield-Smith, K. (2006). A review of quantitative research in management control systems and strategy. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 2, 753-783.
Liang, X., & Frösén, J. (2020). Examining the link between marketing controls and firm performance: The mediating effect of market-focused learning capability. Journal of Business Research, 109, 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.021
Lopes, I.F., Beuren, I.M., & Gomes, T. (2019). Influência do uso do sistema de controle gerencial e da estratégia organizacional no desempenho da inovação. Revista Universo Contábil, 15(1), 85-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2019105
Luo, X., Huang, F., Tang, X., & Li, J. (2020). Government subsidies and firm performance: Evidence from high-tech start-ups in China. Emerging Markets Review. In press, 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100756
Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., & Van Zijl, T. (2014). Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.002
Mas-Verdú, F., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2015). Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 793-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.030
Merchant, K.A., & Van der Stede, W.A. (2007). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Pearson Education.
Miller, A., & Dess, G.G. (1993). Assessing Porter's (1980) model in terms of its generalizability, accuracy and simplicity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 553-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00316.x
Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Müller-Stewens, B., Widener, S. K., Möller, K., & Steinmann, J. (2020). The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101078
Noelia, F.L., & Rosalia, D.C. (2020). A dynamic analysis of the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in reducing innovation obstacles for startups. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, 1-12, e00192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00192
Oh, D.S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Oliveira, M., Curado, C., & Henriques, P.L. (2019). Knowledge sharing among scientists: A causal configuration analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 777-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.044
Oyadomari, J.C.T., Cardoso, R.L., Silva, B.O.T., & Perez, G. (2010). Sistemas de controle gerencial: estudo de caso comparativo em empresas inovadoras no Brasil. Revista Universo Contábil, 6(4), 21-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc.20106
Oro, I.M., & Lavarda, C.E.F. (2019). Interface between management control systems and strategy and performance measures in a family business. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(79), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201806490
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
Pavlatos, O. (2021). Drivers of management control systems in tourism start-ups firms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 1-9, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102746
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter, M.E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, March/April, 173-145.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review, November/December, 61‐78.
Ragin, C.C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C.C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rompho, N. (2018). Operational performance measures for startups. Measuring Business Excellence, 22(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2017-0028
Samagaio, A., Crespo, N. F., & Rodrigues, R. (2018). Management control systems in high-tech start-ups: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 89, 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.028
Sandino, T. (2007). Introducing the first management control systems: evidence from the retail sector. The Accounting Review, 82(1), 265-293. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.265
Silva, T.B.D.J., Beuren, I.M., Monteiro, J.J., & Lavarda, C.E.F. (2022). Strategic behavior and the use of management control systems in agro-industrial cooperatives. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i1.4138
Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56, 809-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
Simons, R. (1987). Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90024-9
Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120105
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976
Widener, S.K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 757-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001
White, R.E. (1986). Generic business strategies, organizational context and performance: an empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070304
Woodside, A.G. (2012). Incompetency training: Theory, practice, and remedies. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.025
Woodside, A.G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
Woodside, A.G., Hsu, S.Y., & Marshall, R. (2011). General theory of cultures' consequences on international tourism behavior. Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 785-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.008
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os direitos autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais. A revista permitirá o uso dos trabalhos publicados para fins não-comerciais, incluindo direito de enviar o trabalho para bases de dados de acesso público. Os artigos publicados são de total e exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação;
• O(s) autor(es) declaram que o artigo não possui conflitos de interesse.